According to Hootsuite and We Are Social, following the sixth year of their reporting, 16 million Australians are now on Facebook. With 75% of these users checking their social media at least once a day (compared to the global average of 55%), its hard to understand why people still believe – and even stranger, maintain – that there is a difference between this element of their daily life, and what they confusingly, inaccurately label ‘Real Life’.
The power the internet possesses to connect every corner of the globe, and our almost (seemingly) unlimited access to information means that, used correctly, the digital and online realm may yet be the biggest and best enhancer of modern existence – and so it seems that the misuse of the term ‘in real life’, is more born out of convenient denial, rather than a person’s honest belief that what they do online, isn’t actually ‘really’ them.
Any ‘Instagram boyfriend’ (or girlfriend) dutifully following their partner around and snapping perfectly posed images for them to post online would have to confess that there is a whole contrived world that gets created and shared online (for various reasons). Surely then, that can only be seen as an extension of that Instagrammer’s ‘true’ reality (Instagram being the example here only – whatever your favourite social media platform is, it doesn’t make a difference) – even if that ‘reality’ lies on a foundation that you need the feedback of a double tap/like – and that without this absolutely contrived digital self, their ‘real’ self would potentially suffer.
Choosing what counts as ‘real life’ (and not), is probably something done out of fear of judgement (perpetuated by social media – more on this in articles to come), or some preconceived idea that unless it happens face-to-face, in 3d or ‘in real life’ (IRL), its insufficient, or unsubstantiated, or inconsequential, or simply: weird. – As though no stranger – no people who had never met – prior to the advent of social media, and our digital, avatar-existence – ever had a way of crossing the line of ‘I like the look of this person’ – our first, inevitable, unavoidable assessment, before we might dare to fully approach another human.
Now having this means of crossing that line at our disposal, the line is potentially being abused, or moved, and Tinder – another social media platform that has infiltrated our lives – is a great example of the population’s unwillingness – a kind of discomfort (probably related to people’s poor impression of Tinder as a legitimate way to connect) – to admit that the digital, online, social media space is a part of our ‘real life’ itself, rather than being something that we – or that many of us – try and distinguish as being separate from our ‘real’ self.
And if you disagree, the question begs: If your social media persona and image isnt you, why are you pretending that it is?
What’s more, is that perpetuating this separation via the use of specific language (e.g. the distinction that Tinder, for example, is not real life), probably explains why so many people behave so disrespectfully (to others, and themselves) in the online world. Keeping a line between your ‘real life’ and your online ‘you’ might make you more comfortable with doing things you wouldn’t ordinarily have the fortitude to do (like letting everyone -potentially 1000’s of people, mostly strangers, see your ass in a Brasillian bikini; or openly slandering someone you don’t know, haven’t met, and who’ll never hear, see or know you enough to retaliate).
Sounds kind of dumb, doesn’t it? But still, its rife, because, it seems, people find it entertaining – not because its entertainment, but because its presented in a way that makes us believe that someone is ‘weird’ or a ‘creep’ for stepping outside the parameters of a world we call (when it suits us) ‘not real’. If reaching out to someone like this, or wanting to engage with another human in this way makes us creeps, or weirdoes, maybe we all need our fucking heads checked?
Despite the fact that Instagram says there are over 9 million active users in Australia, versus Tinder’s 3 million or so, an inboxed message on Instagram (and lets just assume its an eloquent, inoffensive attempt to connect) is a ‘random person’. But if they message via a match on Tinder (achieved with little more than two people liking the digital look of each other, whilst flicking at their screen during a shit) – then it’s a connection we’re comfortable with engaging? – Why? Because we’ve been taught to believe that this is ok, but other means of ‘breaking the ice’ are not.
For all of the internet’s ability to ‘connect’ us all, the onus is – and always has been – on us to get over ourselves, and realize that this world – where we relinquish a certain level of privacy by having social media accounts, and so can expect the subsequent invasions you might expect if you put yourself out there, however you may do so – is the world we’re now living in. And its not going to go away….
There are some very interesting double standards around all of this too – where unreasonable parameters and critiques (that we’ve perhaps all been guilty of using at some point or another) are employed when it suits us, forgotten when they dont: A polite message showing appreciation of someone’s style, or beauty, is often well-received, even welcomed. But the same message, sent by someone ugly (lets just say they look like Penrith Panthers director and rugby league commentator Phil Gould) is offensive, and from a creep.
No-one is suggesting that potential victims or those suffering from it take a portion of the blame for unwanted or unwarranted attention or online advances, but its probably time we all took responsibility for our online personas, woke up and realized that we arent entitled to drop our standards, loosen our morals and behave like cunts we pretend we arent, just because we’re hiding on the other side of a screen, and accept the fact that what we do online, how we do it, is no longer separate from ‘real life’: it is real life – or certainly, a very real facet of life itself.
If how you present yourself and how you behave online is different from the other you, its probably you yourself that isn’t real.