the world & some thoughts

Free association

Posted by: Carlos Hurworth on: September 30, 2009

And I feel like I’m crazy.  Crazy, he says.  Mind wandering and wandering around all these possibilities, all these impossibilities, and all these other random things, lost in the haze of his thoughts.  Looking at himself.  Watching his behaviour with another eye.  And another eye.  And another set of eyes.  Feeling insane.  Watching the man doing what he is doing and thinking that motherfucker is insane, - what is he doing?  Why is he doing that?  Laughing like an animal.  Smiling like an animal.  -  And what do animals smile about anyway?  What does an animal’s smile look like?  And how do we know what they are smiling at?  Or if indeed it is actually a smile.  It is easy enough to mimic certain emotions.  We know what they feel like, we know what they look like – to us.  We perceive our emotions with a certain image.  With something we can visualise.  So when we feel sad, we see our sad face.  When we feel gay, we see a FAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGG face, and when we feel smiley, we see a smiley face.  So why not just mimic these faces!  Or, perhaps some people already do?

Ever been walking down the street, gaily, nodding at someone as they passer you by?  They smile back at you, but what does it mean?  Is it a smile?  Has their face been paralysed?  Are they on drugs?  Do they like you?  Do I know what I’m talking about?

(I feel like I’m crazy.  Again.  I know I’m just writing at the speed of type, and going crazy and trying to keep up with my thoughts and try and keep up with this urge, this force that says, write write write.  The point seems unclear.  The whirr of the microwave says that it might be the point)…

I realise I’m merely wasting time as the microwave cooks my pizza.  It hums in the background, clicking on and off, its currents of convection will soon produce some form of midnight snack.  I cant sleep.  I don’t want to sleep.  It seems extremely boring and wasteful to sleep, when I could be doing this instead.  When you’re sleeping, you do nothing but sleep – and perhaps, dream.  But when you’re awake, the possibilities of what you can do are virtually endless.  Right now, I’m waiting for a pizza to cook…

And you are reading this.

What’s wrong with the kids?

Posted by: Carlos Hurworth on: September 28, 2009

Currently researching a piece for a writer’s website addressing the causes of youth crime in the UK, I am testing an hypothesis that irresponsible, ill-prepared parents are more to blame than anything else.  – It sounds like a surefire winner in terms of approach, but there are many aspects of society and youth that can be addressed and attacked.

Be that as it may, a little moment today afforded me some confidence in my theory:  Velour-clad, ridden with cheap makeup and over-laquered hair all framed with excessively plucked eyebrows, on a canvas of whiter than white pale skin, a 20 something mother pushed her (maybe) 2 year old in his pram weaving through the usual crowd at King’s Cross underground station, her 5 year old, wandering as though lost, but bewildered beside her.  With any luck, her children’s lives would be low-class forever, their education spawning from the woman who was literally screaming “Fuck you, you fucking bastards!” at another commuter.  When she wasnt satisfied that she’d conveyed her needless anger enough, she spun around from the direction she was heading to unleash another tirade of fucks, cunts, bastards and motherfuckers.

She then realised that her fury had led her to the wrong platform, and began muttering swear-words to herself.

A stampede of graceful linguistics and calm manner that her children will no doubt grow to inherit and share with the world around them.

It is this kind of grass-roots education that will ensure that the UK’s youth will continue to share news headlines with our most upstanding member’s of society.  And dont they do it well.

Fashion sucks. A disease.

Posted by: Carlos Hurworth on: September 24, 2009

Its amazing how people change at the whim of alcohol.  How its supply can turn a whole group of people into frenzied animals, like a nazi dictator whipping his brainwashed nation into a fury of unbridled and unjustified hate and ill-manner.  Disgusting really.

After working some of this city’s most massive parties as part of the prestigious London Fashion Week, i have been privvy to some of the most disgusting displays of uncivilised behaviour ever known to man.  And I dont exaggerate.  Not in this case anyway.

At the crux of this whole abomination was alcohol.  People fiending over it, screaming for it, pushing, shoving and yelling for it, like it was the only chance they had at lasting another minute on this godforsaken and greed inpsired earth of ours.  Like they were choking to death on the endless amounts of shit that they ingest and regurgitate, and they needed alcohol to wash their mouths clean.  People who, because of the industry they thrive and live in, because of the vacuous, ass-licking, ass-kissing, physcophantic, back-stabbing world they live in, because of the selfish, mannerless, materialistic, shallow, superficial pool they swim in, and people who because of the influential, artistic, cultured and culturing work they carry out, should be seen to be displaying the utmost in civilised behaviour, simply behaved like deranged and brutish animals.

If only they could have seen themselves. -  And there’s every chance that their vanity led them to do so, but the darkness inside their own anal columns, where their heads were firmly lodged, surely obscured their view from the world outside. – Reality. – Something with which they are all so obviously disconnected with.

With free alcohol on offer, these people at the forefront of cultured and artistic society soon saw it fit to push people out of the way to get to the front of the bar; to swipe handfulls of other peoples drinks if they werent quick enough to get them themselves; they saw it fit to thump their fists on the bar yelling “Give me some fucking alcohol!” (and that was just the girls) all while making complete, drunk cunts of themselves, without a single shred of gratitude to the service that we were giving them, and the party that they were having, thanks to us.  Please and thankyou aside (or lack of it), the stampede that was their behaviour was truly beyond belief.  For hours.

It may sound like im blaming alcohol for this demise.  For their demise.  But take a case where ive been lucky enough to host other parties of similar size and intent, with a crowd that those i was serving on the weekend would excrete on from their position on the social and economic ladder (or so they think).  Free drinks, loud music, high spirits, and plenty of thankyous, patience, understanding, help and respect, on the contrary.  – It wasnt just the alcohol.

The fashion industry needs to take a long hard look at itself and who is representing it:  A bunch of self-indulgent, deranged, delusional, putrid, weak, superfical, uncivilised, vacuous, self-important, animal wannabes.  And for the beautiful ones: congratulations on a successful trip down the birthcanal, and living long enough to exploit the looks that your gene pool gifted you with.  You’ve worked hard not to die.

The industry and its peers need to realise that much of the false sense of importance that they all inherit is simply because they feed each other endless lies, with only intention of personal gain.  Lets face it, you’re probably not really as good as you think you are, everyone just tells you that so you think they’re your ally, so they can rape you when you’re drunk.  Thankyou for everything.

does god really exist?

Posted by: Carlos Hurworth on: September 16, 2009

an answer to one of life's biggest questions

an answer to one of life's biggest questions

Tags:

al-Megrahi’s release still being exploited

Posted by: Carlos Hurworth on: September 16, 2009

In the wake of revelation after revelation of the British government’s relationship with Libya – magnified by struggling politicians jostling for public support and opinion – many simple facts are being misconstrued or completely ignored, while the relevance of the dying Abdel Baset al-Megrahi’s release is being further and further stretched.

Whether deals with ministers were (as the Evening Standard of September 15 has reported) “stuck before Lockerbie bomber was set free”, and “special forces [are] training Libyan troops”, or “Britain is supporting Libya’s bid to join the WTO” or any of this is a “strategy of appeasement” should be totally irrelevant to the matter of the Lockerbie bomber’s release.

Nevertheless, fingers are constantly being pointed and questions are constantly being asked of the Scottish government and the British Prime minister with relation to al-Megrahi, like a sadistic, belligerent child, kicking a wounded and defenceless dog.

The simple facts of the matter are that irrespective of trade deals and appeasement, people (especially the politically weak) are neglecting to see the fact that al-Megrahi is a dying man from a country that suffered years of crippling sanctions due to the weak convictions of a man whose guilt still hasn’t been proven beyond reasonable doubt.  His case has been well known to be full of holes and a distinct lack of credible evidence, and his compassionate release also operates completely within the bounds of Scottish (and British) law.

Perhaps an independent inquiry is needed to address the dishonesty of our politicians, but using al-Megrahi as a pawn to pull political favour is a hopeless attempt at political muck-racking and merely a self-righteous, fact-dodging and abrasive ploy that its proponents should be ashamed of, and that the public will surely find baseless once al-Megrahi dies.

Taking it too far

Posted by: Carlos Hurworth on: September 12, 2009

At what point does our quest for greater technology, more innovation and new frontiers become superfluous?  One of our greatest differences – the thing that sets us apart from the rest of the animal world – is our intelligence; Our desire for knowledge and our ability to seek it and improve.  While this may provide the cure to diseases, more efficient use of energy, or safer cars – is there really a need for faster cars, bigger planes, crazier gaming consoles or more blades on your razor?  At what point does technological advancement become destructive to our race?  At what point should we be satisfied with what we have? At what point does technological advancement reign purely for the benefit of a company’s bottom line and future growth?

There are many that argue (and Albert Einstein was one of them – many, many years ago) that there is a point in technological advancement where its negative impact starts to outweigh the positive.  Case in point is the common razor blade.  Or should i say, common razor 2, 3, 4 or 5 blade?  Now, while the negative impact may not be immediately clear (how about the extra packaging, the massive cost to the consumer and the extra waste?) the point (pushed down your throat with a slick marketing campaign and the latest technology in computer graphics) of the razor blade is the smoothest, most comfortable shave ever – soon to be negated by the natural growth of your beard, when a day later, it wont be the smoothest, most comfortable shave ever. Toothbrushes are the same.  How many times can such a simple device be reinvented and reinvented – and for what point?  When they design a razor blade that shaves beneath my skin and a toothbrush that cleans my teeth in one fell swoop, then ill see the point to spending millions on research and development, advertising and marketing – other than the need for company profit and blind, pointless greed.  It seems we are losing our place in reality, where self-awareness is fading away and we’re on an insatiable hunt for more, more, more! – Like the selfish beings that we are.

There comes a point when we should realise that we’ve taken it too far.  There comes a point when we realise that we should be happy with what we’ve got, and where we should realise that parts of the world are falling apart around us, and faster cars, bigger planes, crazier computers, quicker consumerism, easier cooking and bigger machines arent helping to reverse those effects.    There comes a point when we realise that enough should be enough.  There comes a point when our selfishness and greed outweighs our compassion and forethought.  I realised this this morning when i was about to brush my teeth with my new, “polishing star” incorporating, super-whitening toothbrush.  -  Will it actually work?  I guess the placebo will do just fine.

Weak attempts to use al-Megrahi case for political gain

Posted by: Carlos Hurworth on: September 8, 2009

The compassionate release of terminally ill Lockerbie bomber Abdel Baset al-Megrahi, and weak political parties in the UK vying for support in a climate of ill-confidence in our MP’s, has combined to cause controversy over a decision that otherwise, should only have raised controversy of a marginal and brief kind.

There are obvious and various reasons as to why controversy has arisen, but the convictions against al-Megrahi have even come into question this week, with reports finding that he may well be a victim of a miscarriage of justice.

These reports – from his appeal against conviction – could be made public later this week.

In any case, this is a dying man – released on perfectly legal grounds – and also a man charged on the basis of very limited and fallible evidence (al-Megrahi was never linked to the bombing, nor was any evidence provided that he handled any explosives) where the prosecution’s star witness even had their credibility heavily questioned, amongst a spate of conspiracy theories.

Furthermore, Libya’s acceptance of their role in this tragedy saw them pay out millions in compensation, suffer years of trade and travel restrictions, and may have dictated to their government that pacifism and cooperation would ease these crippling sanctions.

The case against Libya and al-Megrahi is certainly poor and what’s more, is that the controversy surrounding his release simply ignores the fact that Scottish law dictates that a prisoner within 3 months of his death should be released, no matter his crime or guilt.  Insisting that he die like an animal suffering in a jail cell surely brings those who believe in this kind of justice down to the level that they also seem to think al-Megrahi is on.

The US’s cries of outrage are even more hypocritical – a massacre of men, women and children by US troops during the Vietnam war saw the guilty Lt William Calley serve only 2 weeks of his sentence in prison, before he was released on house arrest.  40 years after this shameful event, he has finally publicly apologised.

Above all of this, the outcry over al-Megrahi’s release further serves to show how our own morality dissolves when we are asked to judge someone that we see as committing a heinous crime.  At the end of the day, al-Megrahi will die as the human being that he is, and our MP’s will be further exposed as politically weak.

A clockwork orange

Posted by: Carlos Hurworth on: September 3, 2009

In Anthony Burgess’s classic novel, one of the main characters and our narrator is reduced to A clockwork Orange – a man unable to exercise his own free will – through the use of a closely monitored but controversial technique, touted as the solution to juvenile delinquency and in the case of the story, as a combatant to the socially unacceptable ultra violence that Alex and his “droogs” regularly participate in.

The methods in Burgess’s story involve aversion therapy – a method that associates a certain stimulus with a negative or unpleasant sensation – and while doctors and medicos alike will say that it is vastly different from torture (and essentially, it certainly is) what transpires in A clockwork Orange is surely what you and I would consider torturous.  Definitions of aversion therapy may preclude descriptions of torture, but this certainly isn’t the case if you consider torture’s definitions of severe pain and suffering, physical or mental.

The book’s narrator, Alex – through the process of conditioning (the “Ludovico technique”, as it is called in the novel) – is essentially forbidden to exercise his own moral choices in life, something that the chaplain in the prison where he is initially held is strongly against and something that he argues, is a necessity to humanity.

Similar points may now well be being raised in the political sphere, as reports on the slowly combusting case of the “secret CIA” prisoner programmes in the International Herald Tribune earlier this week – which initially harked to gross misconduct and a gruesome picture of out of control operatives partaking in sadistic activities – are now claiming (and the story carefully treads the line between vindication and condemnation) that the CIA programme was “closely watched” (August 27) – a sort of Ludovico technique of their own.

The article, outlined specific details of the requirements for each prisoner, which included precise instructions for lighting cells, the exact volume of the constant white noise being played to the suspects being held captive, the temperature of the water to be used for water boarding and for how long, amongst other strict instructions.  While this control was said to ensure that the program was “safe and legal”, the article seemingly borders on contradiction when it later quotes a document as stating that “the prisoner finds himself in the complete control of the Americans”.  – Not too unlike our Alex and his Clockwork Orange nature, it seems.

The IHT also makes reference to initial news reports citing “aberrations” in the field (such as “threats of execution by handgun or power drill”) no doubt to embolden claims made later in the story, that the activities inside this Washington-run programme were “by no means one of gung-ho operatives running wild.”

Whatever the case may be, international human right’s agreements outlaw humiliating and degrading treatment.  Furthermore, the Geneva Convention also requires all persons to be treated with “humanity” – whether they are protected by the convention or not.

While Alex who in A clockwork orange, comes in for some heavy-handed and life-changing treatment closely monitored by its perpetrators – who swear they are improving society, leading us to ponder inevitable questions of abuse – the results of the brutal though calculated methods of torture (and torture has been used as a method of obtaining information for hundreds of years) being used by the CIA are now also being questioned.

Just as Burgess asks whether society will accept the inhumane treatment of those we deem as behaving unlike humans, are we now more likely to accept that these methods of torture and control are a justified, legal, humane and moral reality in interrogating prisoners?  Or are they indeed even useful in obtaining meaningful, accurate information?  The outcomes remain to be seen.

War over water

Posted by: Carlos Hurworth on: August 30, 2009

There is no doubt of water’s importance to human life and indeed, life itself.  As well as the sun, there is almost no living organism (or none) that can survive without it.  Sustenance aside, humanity may well utilise water in every possible and probable way – harnessing the power of its flow for electricity, using it to regulate cars (or anything with an engine), create steam, grow crops and feed livestock, as well as for its most common every day uses.  Like many of the earth’s natural resources however, the current state of the world’s water supply is beginning to raise questions of its sustainability and the subsequent consequences of its ever-increasing scarcity.

Recent figures state that there are 1 billion people worldwide without access to clean drinking water, while more than twice as many don’t have an adequate supply of consumable water, or water for cooking and cleaning.  Lack of water is a massive factor in many of the world’s biggest problems – in particular, those of malnutrition, hunger and disease (which the world food programme says is causing 25 000 deaths per day).  The livelihood of the many millions of those who depend on agriculture to survive is also being affected.  As time passes – and some countries and continents are only getting drier – the situation revolving around water scarcity is becoming more and more perilous.

Only accepting scarcity causing conflict, and not accepting our own role in this, shuns the responsibility that we have to educate society and humanity on creating, maintaining and sustaining adequate means of ensuring that water is available and accessible to everybody.  This clearly isn’t happening – damage we have been doing to the environment and our water is simply unacceptable:  Runoff from highways  – which can add up to the equivalent of an oil tanker spill in a year; and sewage – where astonishing figures can be found: some noting that Britain’s entire sewage production in a day is in excess of 1 billion litres (some of this is still piped out to sea), are aspects of our every day lives that are polluting our water, almost without real knowledge of its extent and its consequences.

However large they are, even a slight change in the toxicity of our oceans and rivers can cause many lifeforms to suffer.  The New River at the California/Mexico border carries over 75 millions litres of raw sewage with it each day.  Theoretically, sewage could easily be broken down and even provide nutrients to our earth and its water.  Unfortunately though, all of the synthetic chemicals that are increasingly ever-present in our bodies make this impossible – the excess nutrients that end up in our streams, rivers, lakes and oceans can often cause algal blooms that can kill massive amounts of natural life and result in years of unbalance to an ecosystem.

And if our sewage dumping problems didn’t seem bad enough, there is also evidence that radioactive waste being dumped by French and British companies is being carried around the oceans water’s by its currents, and causing extraordinary levels of toxicity downstream.

Addressing these problems and limiting their damage should surely be a priority, rather than fighting over a resource that we seem to be slowly poisoning.  What’s more is that futile wars will not ensure the longevity of our earth’s water, and hence the human race.  War over water selfishly neglects future generations and a massive amount of compounding facets of their lives.

Areas where conflict is occurring more often are frequently being seen in developing countries with poor infrastructure.  Peru for example, sees more than 2 million people not having access to drinking water in the capital Lima.  To make matters worse, the majority of the population lives in the driest parts of the country where there is only around 1.8% of Peru’s fresh water supply.  Recognising that these issues cause problems which may lead to conflict, should also lead to the realisation that we are essentially shooting ourselves in the foot by neglecting our water supply.  By also effectively managing distribution, the rate of conflict (in Peru’s case, at a local level especially) can surely be drastically reduced.  The economic and social gains to be inherited are surely a distinguishable motivation for world leaders, further highlighting the importance of effective management and education.

While future conflict over water may affect the state of the world, water crises resulting from human damage, weather patterns (which are more often being affected by our own behaviour) and poor decision making will certainly impact our lives.  – Perhaps to a far greater extent.  In Australia recently, drought conditions were so severe for many parts of the country’s states that residents faced heavy restrictions (and fines for not following them) on water usage.  At one point in Queensland’s Brisbane, many dams were in single figures in terms of the percentage of their capacity remaining, and watering of lawns and hosing of paths was made illegal, while home owners were sent timers in the mail set to countdown four minutes – the recommended showering time to keep water usage per person down to 150 litres a day.  Managing our water in a more sensible manner will not only serve to sustain our supply of water, but it will also lessen the chance of conflict arising over its scarcity.

Educating against irresponsible, ineffective and inefficient water use – that is ultimately causing the demise of a resource that some allege we will be fighting wars over in the future (UN reports claim that access to water will be responsible for war in Africa in the next 25 years) – is a far more pressing concern when it comes to our survival.  Perhaps the irony in it all – in these times of technological advancement and forward thinking (some argue, that technology reaches a point where its benefits are outweighed by its harms) – is our lack of knowledge for natural remedies to our water problems.  In an ever-increasingly urbanising world, there is no longer room for ponds and tanks, or native trees – all of which will preserve our water’s supply. Whether or not this is a concern for the companies with millions to make from developing our world, is a question with an often unfortunate answer.

Soon enough too, the market for supplying water to under-privileged communities will also become a lucrative one, and just as wars have been fought in the past over land, oil and gas (for example) conflict over water is almost inevitable.  The pure necessity of water’s availability for our survival however, means that it is imperative that these wars (however and whenever they occur) result in sustainable, responsible management of this precious resource – lest we master our own demise.   What is more important – planning to manage and sustain our water supply, or planning to fight over its death?

Lies and coverups from the top

Posted by: Carlos Hurworth on: August 26, 2009

In the quickly ebbing and flowing wake of investigations into British and American intelligence operations with regard to terror suspects and detainees, accusations of illegal and undisclosed means of interrogation are becoming rife.

From the MI5 to the CIA, investigations are being leaked, reports are being published and legal proceedings are taking place.

The Uk Guardian’s front page yesterday printed headlines reporting that CIA interrogators “made threats to kill families of detainees”.  The internal CIA report stated that interrogators, prying for information “threatened Khalid Sheikh Mohammed” who is said to have masterminded the September 11 attacks saying “we’re going to kill your children” if there was another attack on the US.

Other Al-Qaida leaders were interrogated under instructions to imply that they were going to “sexually abuse female relatives in front of the detainee”.

The report – which has been released due to court action being sought by a legal rights group – even quoted the concerns of some of the interrogating officers, one saying that “ten years from now we’re going to be sorry we’re doing this”.

Not isolated incidents (the report documented “unauthorised, improvised and inhumane” techniques being used at Guantanamó and secret prisons around the world) the interrogators were also reported as having brought power drills and handguns into interrogation rooms, as well as staging mock executions in order to force information out of suspected terrorists.

Abuse of power has been going on behind closed doors, ever since it has been wielded.  Too infrequently however, are these powerful people questioned or confronted.  Too often does the general public merely accept what we are fed, entrusting people who arent necessarily as self-righteous as they like to seem with pursuing public interest, following rules and in this case especially – extracting information.

Whats more is that these people walking the hallowed corridoors in the offices where our countries are run, are trying to cover up their misdemeanours, the Guardian reporting that the CIA “fought for years to keep secret” the internal document which clearly shows officers going beyond what is acceptable.

Makes you wonder just how often these things are happening, and how little that we all know?  – If you dont, you should.  Fact is, we will be told what those in power really want us to hear, unless we look ourselves and seek the truth amongst the lies and the misconstrued.


  • Chum Hurworth: enjoyed the first para of this blog, the colour and the life but was laughing at the handwritten part that all sound so familiar to me coming from a c
  • Carlos Hurworth: Evidently, i employ you. Furthermore, the fact that you perceive what you've read as "mindless poorly written babble" is obvious evidence that it fli
  • Justin Megawarne: I recommend scrawling an addition underneath with the notably absent "probably not" option, presumably omitted to create some kind of subtle suggestio

Categories